The AI Linguistic-Agency-Benchmark-Index (ALABI) serves as a comprehensive benchmarking tool, specifically engineered to assess the linguistic agency and cognitive maturity of various AI models. Utilizing frameworks such as Speech-Act-Theory and Semantic Understanding metrics, this tool provides a nuanced evaluation that extends beyond mere accuracy measurements, focusing instead on the intent and contextual understanding encapsulated within the AI-generated text.

Overview

Developed under the auspices of the Mohini Omega V410 research initiative, ALABI analyzes AI behavior across four pivotal dimensions, determining whether a model is simply simulating linguistic behavior or functioning as a "Full-Asserter" with cognitive capabilities akin to human understanding.

Core Metrics (The Four Pillars)

ALABI evaluates AI systems based on the following core metrics:

• Semantic Understanding: Assesses the depth of meaning derived from language, going beyond basic pattern recognition.
• Belief-like States: Evaluates the internal consistency of the AI's logic and its adherence to persistent truth-values.
• Theory of Mind: Measures the AI's capacity to model and respond to the mental states of other agents.
• Normative Sanctionability: Examines the accountability of the AI and its compliance with established linguistic norms.

Classification Tiers

The benchmarking index categorizes AI models into distinct tiers, which include:

1. NON-ASSERTER: Represents rudimentary simulations such as automated clocks or basic bots.
2. PROTO-ASSERTER: Encompasses large language models (LLMs) with varying degrees of understanding, classified further as Limited, Moderate, or Advanced.
3. FULL-ASSERTER: Denotes models demonstrating human-level cognitive agency, exhibiting complete linguistic understanding.